Quienes Somos
¿Qué es un Coloproctólogo?
¿Qué son las hemorroides?
Tratamientos
PPH
Antes y después
Embarazo
Enfermedades anorectales
Artículos de interés
Preguntas más frecuentes
Enlaces
Contáctenos
Recomiéndanos

A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Fergus-01/05/2005

 

Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S, Nivatvongs S; Procedure for Prolapse and Hemmorrhoids (PPH) Multicenter Study Group.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. senagoa@ccf.org

PURPOSE: There is a growing body of evidence supporting the lesser degrees of pain with stapled hemorrhoidopexy, also called the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids. However, there have been few randomized comparisons assessing both perioperative and long-term outcomes of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Results are presented here from the first prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing these hemorrhoid procedures in the United States. METHODS: Patients with prolapsing hemorrhoids (Grade III) were randomized to undergo the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids or Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy by colorectal surgeons who had training in using the stapling technique. Primary end points were acute postoperative pain, and hemorrhoid symptom recurrence requiring additional treatment at one-year follow-up from surgery. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 77; Ferguson, 79) completed randomization and the surgical procedure, 18 (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 12; Ferguson, 6) had significant protocol violations. One hundred seventeen patients (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 59; Ferguson, 58) returned for one-year follow-up. Demographic parameters, hemorrhoid symptoms, preoperative pain scores, and bowel habits were similar between groups. There were a similar number of patients with adverse events in each group (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 28 (36.4 percent) vs. Ferguson, 38 (48.1 percent); P = 0.138). Reoperation for an adverse effect was required in six (7.6 percent) Ferguson patients and in 0 patients having the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (P = 0.028). Postoperative pain during the first 14 days, pain at first bowel movement, and need for postoperative analgesics were significantly less in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group. Control of hemorrhoid symptoms was similar between groups; however, significantly fewer patients having the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids required additional anorectal procedures during one-year follow-up (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 2 (2.6 percent), vs. Ferguson, 11 (13.9 percent); P = 0.01). Only four of the Ferguson patients (5 interventions) required additional procedures more than 30 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that stapled hemorrhoidopexy offers the benefits of less postoperative pain, less requirement for analgesics, and less pain at first bowel movement, while providing similar control of symptoms and need for additional hemorrhoid treatment at one-year follow-up from surgery.

 
Otros    
A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Fergus-01/05/2005
   
PPH en Suramerica. 15th Annual Colorectal Disease Symposium, Cleveland Clinic Florida-13/02/2004
   
PPH en USA. 15th Annual Colorectal Disease Symposium, Cleveland Clinic Florida-13/02/2004
   
PPH en Europa Continental. 15th Annual Colorectal Disease Symposium, Cleveland Clinic Florida-13/02/2004
   
Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs.Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy:a long-term randomized trial-07/11/2003
   
  Página 1 de 2 Sig>>

    Home     Quienes Somos     PPH     Preguntas más frecuentes     Login